站内搜索:

百度法律搜索搜不到不利于百度的案件判决书

BaiDu offered its Legal search Engine recently. I just get this news from China Law Prof Blog since I seldom use Baidu.com.

As I have estimated before trying it, Baidu keeps on artificially controlling the searching results. From Baidu's legal search engine, one can not get case materials in which Baidu involved and lost, though these cases can be found in baidu's normal webpage searching results. For instance, a famous case on MP3 downloading issues, in which Baidu was sued by a ShangHai company, dose not exist in Baidu's legal data base. In another cross action between Baidu and 3-7-2-1 (another Chinese Internet service provider), Baidu's law engine only records a judgment in favor to Baidu, whilist another judement in favor to 3-7-2-1 is disappeared.

  因为基本不用百度,所以直到今天才从China Law Prof Blog上看见百度建立“法律搜索”站的消息。这个站显然与北大法律信息网有关。

  但是,在百度上,无法搜到不利于百度的案件判决书。例如,在百度法律搜索中,搜索“上海步升音乐文化传播有限公司”,可以发现该公司为当事人的多个案件,却惟独没有其起诉百度的那个著名案子;再如,如果直接搜索百度公司名称“百度在线网络技术 有限公司”,则只能搜到百度起诉北京三七二一科技有限公司的案子,而几乎同时发生的“三七二一公司诉百度网讯科技有限公司”案则不见踪影。不过,在百度网页搜索中,这些案件都还能搜得到。

  百度似乎已经习惯于通过人工干预搜索结果来维护自己的利益了。

Cartoons by Nikahang Kowsar: http://sicknick.org/archives/03/selfcensorship.shtml



[本日志由 法豆 于 2008-05-02 10:40 AM 编辑]
文章来自: 本站原创
引用通告: 查看所有引用 | 我要引用此文章
Tags: 百度 搜索 案例 Case En
相关日志:
评论: 1 | 引用: 16 | 查看次数: 10720
回复回复上了百度的当的人[2007-10-19 06:36 PM | del]
这也许就是很多人上了当,发了警示,但是却出现不了的缘故,百度真是丢中国人的脸,为了业务竟然采取骗的手段
发表评论
昵 称:
密 码: 游客发言不需要密码.
内 容:
验证码: 验证码
选 项:
虽然发表评论不用注册,但是为了保护您的发言权,建议您注册帐号.
字数限制 3000 字 | UBB代码 开启 | [img]标签 关闭