Tag: <span>载体</span>

Tag: 载体

专业日志

Triple Fixation – from Ideas to Tangible Mediums

In the context of digital copyright law:

  • Works (literature, music, painting) are fixed expression of ideas;
  • Intangible mediums (digital files) are fixation of works with certain digital format in specific sequence;
  • Tangible mediums (CD, hard disk, flash storage) are fixation of intangible mediums.

This three "fixation" are fundamentally distinct from each other. In my view, the solution of the copyright dilemma in the digital age have to be sought from this triple fixation, or any revision to the copyright statutes in the digital age will conflict to the traditional framework that formed in the paper-based material age. The discovery of the intangible mediums is one of my most important academic achievements in recent years. Hope this can be widely accepted.

I am now writing the thesis in which elaborated this dicovery. To discuss this topic, please contact me at Donnie[AT]BLawgDog.com. If you can read Chinese, please also refer to the following article – I raised the concept of intangible mediums firstly in this paper:

DONG Hao:
Neighboring Right Owners’ Right of Communication to the Public through Information Networks

学术论文

董皓：析邻接权人“通过信息网络向公众传播”的权利

Neighboring Right Owners’ Right of Communication to the Public through Information Networks

DONG Hao

Abstract: The Copyright Law of People’s Republic of China("The Law" hereinafter)authorizes neighboring right owners (performers,sounds recorders and video recorders) some "Rights of Communication to the public on Information Networks". This article notes the following arguments: (1) According to The Law,these rights are different to copyright owner’s "Right of Communication of Information on Networks". (2) A performer is incapable to enjoy the right of communicate his own performance to the public on information network,but can merely authorize others to communicate his performance to the public on information network. (3) The sounds recorders and video recorders should have the "right of communication to the public on information network by themselves", whilst The Law neglected itwrongfully. (4) The distinction between "distribution" and "communication to the public on information network" should be clarified by the way of understanding the differences among "work", "medium of work", "tangible medium" and  "intangible medium". (5) It is reasonable to restrict the Radio and Television Stations enjoying the right to communicate to the public on information networks.

Key words: Information network; Neighboring right; Performance; Recording; Intangible Medium

点击下载此文件 Dowload the Full-text Here (PDF)

析邻接权人“通过信息网络向公众传播”的权利

董　皓**

　　本文引用方式：董皓：“析邻接权人‘通过信息网络向公众传播’的权利”，《云南大学学报法学版》第20卷第6期（2007年第6期）。

　　摘要：本文是对现行中国著作权法中，邻接权人“通过信息网络向公众传播”的权利的规范分析。主要有以下观点：第一，《著作权法》中的“信息网络传播权”是著作权人的权利，与邻接权人无涉；第二，表演者只能授权他人通过信息网络向公众传播其表演的权利，而不可能单独享有“自己通过信息网络向公众传播表演”的权利；第三，《著作权法》在录音录像制作者“通过信息网络向公众传播”的权利的规定中，出现了漏洞；第四，区分通过信息网络“传播”与“发行”的关键在于理解音像制品与载体、有形载体和无形载体的区别；第五，广播组织不应该享有类似权利。

　　关键词：信息网络传播，邻接权，表演，录音录像，载体

专业日志 itemprop="discussionURL"2

案件摘要及评点：删除数字文档不被认为构成软件侵权？

友情提醒：本站的案件摘要内容经过编选提炼和评论，具有著作权，转载请察看本站版权政策。

案件名：
游戏米果网络科技(上海)有限公司与赖介婷、罗金海、童卓娟、林杨、赵千里、肖哿计算机软件著作权侵权纠纷——(2007)沪二中民五(知)初字第82号

来源：中国知识产权裁判文书网
http://ipr.chinacourt.org/public/detail_sfws.php?id=11396
相关案件：
(2007)沪二中民五(知)初字第71号、(2007)沪二中民五(知)初字第81号

当事人：原告：游戏米果网络科技(上海)有限公司
被告：赖介婷、罗金海、童卓娟、林杨、赵千里、肖哿

专业日志

析邻接权人“通过信息网络向公众传播”的权利

本文不适用本站创作共用约定，未经作者许可，不得转载及通过信息网络传播。
 
析邻接权人“通过信息网络向公众传播”的权利
 
董　皓*
 
　　摘要：本文是对现行中国著作权法中，邻接权人“通过信息网络向公众传播”的权利的规范分析。主要有以下观点：第一，《著作权法》中的“信息网络传播权”是著作权人的权利，与邻接权人无涉；第二，表演者只能授权他人通过信息网络向公众传播其表演的权利，而不可能单独享有“自己通过信息网络向公众传播表演”的权利；第三，《著作权法》在录音录像制作者“通过信息网络向公众传播”的权利的规定中，出现了漏洞；第四，区分通过信息网络“传播”与“发行”的关键在于理解音像制品与载体、有形载体和无形载体的区别；第五，广播组织不应该享有类似权利。
　　关键词：信息网络传播，邻接权，表演，录音录像，载体
 
 
Neighboring Right Owners’ Rights to Communicate to the Public on Information Networks in China Copyright Law
DONG Hao
(Yunnan University, Kunming 650091)
　　Abstract: The Copyright Law of People’s Republic of China ("The Law" hereinafter) authorizes neighboring right owners (performers, sounds recorders and video recorders) some "Rights of Communication to the public on Information Networks". This article notes the following arguments: (1) According to The Law, these rights are different to copyright owner’s "Right of Communication of Information on Networks". (2) A performer is incapable to enjoy the right of communicate his own performance to the public on information network, but can merely authorize others to communicate his performance to the public on information network. (3) The sounds recorders and video recorders should have the "right of communication to the public on information network by themselves", but The Law neglected it wrongfully. (4) The distinction between "distribution" and "communication to the public on information network" should be clarified by the way of understanding the differences among "work", "carrier of work", "tangible carrier" and "intangible carrier". (5) It is reasonable to restrict the Radio and Television Stations enjoying the right to communicate to the public on information networks.
　　Keywords: information network, neighboring right, performance, recording, carrier of work