张樊对业内问题的把握程度明显比我敏锐，看到我长篇累牍地写了几篇有关中文Blawg Sphere的东西后，很快抓住了实质：现在聚集在FYFZ里的Blawgger们，虽然大多满足于其现有的功能，但也已经出现了SNS的需求。我将其总结为：除了表达，我们还需要交流。
张樊今天还把China Blawg Review（中国法律博客观察）建立起来了，我也是管理员。这里转贴一些有关中国法律博客的讨论和评论，这属于“Blogger人类学”的范畴，呵呵不过应该不仅限于这个范畴。可以做一些范围更广的研讨。
地址：http://www.ChinaBlawgReview.org/ 欢迎大家访问，也可先看这篇：推动中国法律博客发展：关于建立China BLawg Review的提议，这是我们一开始的初衷，不过可能这个网站应该不仅仅限于Reviews，边摸索边调整吧。
最近几天疯写Blogs，必须告一个段落了……hoho…
吴丹红的《有感于“法博三剑客”》发表后，引起了一场争论，我在公爵王的相关文章《看法律博客的风向标》中凑热闹留了言，这里把思路再整理下，希望本文不但能澄清和防止一些不必要的争论，并且让争论变为更深入的讨论，从而对所谓中文法律博客圈（Chinese Blawgsphere）的发展有更多的助益。呼…似乎有点托大，不过嘛，请大家先看看再砸好了，呵呵。
小弟不是和事佬，不过我还是得先说一句：在大的原则立场上，大家的看法差异不大——丹红也好，公爵也罢，都对“blogger”们自由地发表言论没什么异议（不好意思，不是故意说英文，后面大家就知道我为什么不用“博客”或者别的什么了）。我想，之所以会发生争论，主观上也许是因为不同的人期望阅读到的东西不一样，或者说大家喜欢的文风不同（这其实真的可以理解，每个人都会喜欢或不喜欢某些文风），但客观上还存在一个原因，那就是大家在发言前，似乎还没对争论的基点，也即“法律博客是个什么东西？”有清晰的认识。我跟女朋友（扯远了，汗ing）打电话也常犯这种错，本来好好的，但说着说着就生气了，等回过头来一想，其实是大家没把说话的前提弄清楚，从而产生了误解。
一、我们讨论的是什么
有误解，当然要澄清，否则就没法讨论下去了（这不，丹红兄就关闭了自己那篇文章的评论），可是不讨论更不好——小两口憋不住了还有一句我爱你，Blawgsphere里没了交流，那可就难得弥合了。所以，我们必须先把所谓“法律博客是什么”搞清楚。
I have mentioned in last lawg that Chines blawgs are mostly like formal journals but not classical blogs. I am trying to analysis its reason in this post. Heh, follow the formal style of Chinese blawgs, I may name this essay as "An Empiristic Research form the Perspective of Sociology of Knowledge"…
Let’s recall the history of the personal legal website in China.
Around and/or after 1995, touched by the Internet, some pioneers established the first generation of Chinese personal pages conerning legal issues. The earliest and most famous one is "China Judge", found by Yau Zheng-hui, a judge in Fujian Province (I myself has one also, see its remains here). These websites had a common character: like a self-edited magazine as well as a personal book shelf which included articles, books and other things that did or did not created by the site owner.
In the very beginning, contents created other than the founder of the sites often came directly from the authors. At that time, most legal researchers and practicers were not very familiar with the Internet. Normally being friends of the legal sites owners, they agree to publish their works in cyberspace freely after a rough consideration in that the publication in cyberspace would not affect their interstes.