Tag: <span>董皓</span>

Tag: 董皓

学术论文

Donnie Dong’s Publications

 

List of Donnie Dong’s Publications
(after 2003, click article titles for abstract and/or fulltext) 
 

Journal/Academic Articles
  1. DONG Hao, Domain Name Right and Rights on Domain Names, Cyber-space Law Review, Vol. 4, Beijing: Law Press (2004);
     
  2. ZHANG Chu & DONG Hao, Internet Transaction Requires Legal Protection: A Brief Review of China’s Electronic Signature Code, Prosecute Daily, July 5th, 2004, republished (full-text) in Civil and Commercial Law – Photocopies of References by Renmin University of China, Vol. 9 (2004);
     
  3. DONG Hao & ZHANG Chu, Security Liability of Internet Service Providers, Network & Computer Security, Vol. 39 (2004);
     
  4. DONG Hao, The Legal Definition of Intangible Property and Its Protection: From the Perspective of Empirical Studies on World Heritages, Journal of Yunnan University – Law Edition, Vol.19 (2006 No. 2); Republished (full-text) in Civil and Commercial Law – Photocopies of References by Renmin University of China, (2006 No. 9);
     
  5. DONG Hao, Legal Issues on the Hacked Internet Account, 2 Forefront of the Internet 35 (Beijing, 2008);
     
  6. DONG Hao & ZHANG Fan, A Report on the Netizens’ Concerns on Information Network Security,Foreland Law Report of Intellectual Property, Vol. 2 (Beijing: Prosecution Press, 2008);
     
  7. Hao DONG & MinKang GU, Copyrightable or Not: A Review of the Chinese Provision on "Illegal Works" Targeted by WTO DS362 and Suggestions for Legal Reform, in English, Asian Journal of WTO and International Health Law and Policy (SSCI Journal), Vol. 4, Number 2 (2009). An earlier version can be downloaded at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1346325
     
  1. John BURKE & Hao DONG, Competition Policy and Updating Vehicles for the Delivery of Legal Services: The New South Wales Experience and Lessons for Hong Kong, in English, Asian and Pacific Law Review (SSCI Journal), Vol. 17, Number 2 (2009).
     
  2. DONG Hao & GU MinKang, Illegal Works in the Context of Chinese Copyright System, published in Chinese core law journal: Fa Xue (Legal Science), (Shanghai, 2009 No. 3), pp. 75-83. 
     
  3. DONG Hao, Can the Moral Right be Transferred and Waived? A Positive Research to the Chinese Copyright Law, 38 Journal of Yunnan University – Law Edition (2009 No. 2).
     
  4. DONG Hao & TANG Qing, Jacobsen v. Katzer and the Comparative Lessons for Chinese Copyright Reform, China Copyright (2009 No. 4).
     
  5. DONG Hao & GU MinKang, Orphan Works in Copyright Law, "South Lake Forum for Intellectual Property" (2010).


  6. DONG Hao: Discovery of the Intangible Medium: An Analysis of the Right of Communication of Information through Networks under the Logic of the PRC Copyright Law (2012). 
     
  1. DONG Hao, Neighboring Right Owners’ Right of Communicate to the Public through Information Networks, 29 Journal of Yunnan University – Law Edition (2007 No. 6);
     
  2. DONG Hao, The origination of the Neighboring Right Law and Its Significance in Practice, Science-technology and Law, Vol. 70 (2007 No. 6). This article has also been accepted by the 7th China Bar. Forum, and be selected in the Outstanding Articles of the Forum, Beijing: Law Press (2007);
     
  3. DONG Hao, A Legal Analysis on Incoming Distribution of the Tourist Industry, Journal of Yunnan University – Law Edition (2004 No. 3);
     
  4. DONG Hao, YU Qiang: Case-Studies on Minority Women’s Migration, GuiZhou Nationality Review, (2003 No. 1), this article awarded the Second-Class Honor in the Eighth China National “Challenging Cup” Competition for Research Outcomes of College Students;
     
  5. DONG Hao, Promoting and Protecting Human Rights in Transformational Cultures: An Empirical Case-Study in Minority Regions, Achieves for Legal Philosophy and Sociology of Law, Vol. 7 (Beijing, 2004);
     
  6. Jane K. WINN (author), DONG Hao (translator): The Empreor’s New Clothes: The Shocking Truth About Digital Signatures and Internet Commerce, 7 Idaho L. Rev. 353, translation is published inForeland Law Report of Intellectual Property, Vol. 1 (2007), Beijing: Prosecution Press.

 Book Chapters

  1. National Authoritative Textbook Chapters: “Right to Enterprise’s Name”, “Right to Geographic Identification”, "Domain Name Rights” and “Right of Computer Software” in ZHANG Chu (ed.): Intellectual Property Law, Beijing: Higher Education Press (2007);
     
  2. Text Book Chapter: "Taxation Issues in the E-commerce”, in LI Zuming (ed.), E-commerce Law, Beijing: University of International Business and Economics Press (2009);
     
  3. Text Book Chapters: “Intellectual Property Issues on Internet”, “Geographical Indication “ and “International Treaties”, in QI Aimin (ed.), Modern Intellectual Property Law, Suzhou University Press (2004);
     
  4. Book Chapters: “Government Website and Copyright”, “E-Governance and Domain Name Right”, in ZHU Yan (ed.) Protection to Intellectual Properties in Electronic Governance, Beijing: Geologic Press (2006).

 

Selected Essays in Newspaper Columns
 
1.  “Collective Copyright Management should NOT become the Source of Monopoly Profit”, Guangzhou: 21cn Economic Report, 2 December 2009;
 
2.  “Intellectual Story about the Mother’s Day”, Guangzhou: 21cn Economic Report,11 May 2009, reprinted by China Journal of Patent and Invention, No. 6, 2009;
 
3. “When Utopia Consists of Information”, Guangzhou: 21cn Economic Report, 3 April 2009;
 
4.  “Milk Tea and the Rule of Law:  for the 10th Anniversary of Hong Kong’s Handover” , Beijing: Procuratorial Daily, 1 July 2007, republished by XinHua News Agency;
 
5. “Is A Justice of the Peace A Judge?”, Hong Kong: The Standard, 17 September 2008;
 

 

学术论文

论著作权法中的孤儿作品问题

豆按：本文动笔于2006年，初稿完成于2008年并纳入本人论文《多元视角下的著作权法公共领域问题研究》，后经修改在2010年知识产权“南湖论坛”上作为主题发言。鉴于中国国家版权局《著作权法修正案》（草案）中提及孤儿作品问题，但真正深入的论述仍然十分罕见，特再次修改并全文发出，以便研究者和立法者予以批评和参考。
 

[摘要] “孤儿作品”是指因难以找到权利人，利用人无法取得授权的作品。美国2006至2008年已有多项法案提交国会讨论。加拿大、日本、韩国等各国立法中也有解决类似问题的尝试。此外，2009年谷歌公司与两个美国著作权组织向法院提交的“谷歌图书和解协议”中，也尝试以私人合同的方式建立一种解决孤儿作品问题的规则。孤儿作品现象在中国同样存在且可能更为普遍，现行中国著作权制度中，有看上去涉及到孤儿作品，但实际上使孤儿作品问题更加复杂化的制度。它们不但没有为该问题的解决提供足够的制度资源，而且还存在着不合理的规则。经过对国际条约和著作权法原理的通盘考虑，本文提出选择孤儿作品问题的治理方案时应考虑四个方面的因素，以它们为评价标准，才可批评和借鉴各种解决孤儿作品问题的模式和思路。在综合各种模式的优长后，本文结合中国法律史体系的特点提出一套多模式并用的、适合于中国的孤儿作品法律治理方案。