An Introduction of Chinese Blawgs, Beta
Blawgging For China Blawg Review Vol. 1 Ver Beta 0.1
Title: An Introduction of Chinese Blawgs
Ver.: Beta 0.1
Date: 20060330
Ver.: Beta 0.1
Date: 20060330
By: Donnie H. DONG (http://blawgdog.com)
Licence: CC:by-nc-sa
Licence: CC:by-nc-sa
Because of the difficulty of reading Chinese characters (even knowing Chinese, one may be crazy when he find that Chinese itself includes three kinds of totally different computer character formats, that’s why Taiwan might split from China in cyber era, I think), a small part of China Blawg map has been unveiled to English surfers. Actually, most of disclosed China blawgs are with some "foreign link", that is, the blawgers may be foreign researchers and/or lawyers interested in China’s law, or its market, and these blawgs are mostly in pure English.
However, Chinese lawyers have established a large (not very heavy yet) Chinese blawg atlas in Chinese character, though the first legal Chinese blawg service provider appeared just around Jan 2005. Now there are thousands of blawgs in China, and the blawgers covered nearly all legal professions.
Most Chinese blawgs are set on blawg service providers’ servers, and rare ones have their own independent domain name. Now there are 7 blawg service providers. They are FYFZ.cn (more than 8000 registrants), Cnlawblog.com (more than 8000), Lawoy.com (400), Blog.highcourt.org (less than 3000 but only 100 active), Lawblog.cn (700), chinaeclaw.com (less than 400)and Lawspirit.org (more than 1000). The last one declares that it provides a “bilingual” blawg system, but it seems this ad does not allure potential blawgers. Interestingly, the FYFZ.cn, which provides the poorest application, is the most popular one, i.e. there are more than 500 active individual blawgs set on this site and the dozens of new ones are created each day.
The most significant characteristic of FYFZ.cn is that it is more "academic" or even "bookishness" than the others. Although the amount of lawyers’ (I mean barristers and solicitors here) blawgs is the highest, scholars dominate the site undoubtedly. A few eminent professors and more legal researchers lawg there activates, ideas, book chapters and even research proposals on there own blawgs. Among them, Dr. XU Xin becomes the top one with his blawg "Poetical Justice", which get more than 347 thousands hits since Jan 2005. Other famous scholars include Prof. XIE Hui, Prof. LIN Lai-Fan, Prof. HE Wei-fang, Prof. WEI Dun-You, Prof. ZHANG Chu, Prof. ZHANG Jian-Sheng, Prof. ZHANG Hai-Bing, Prof. FAN Jin-Xue, Prof. GU Ming-Kang, etc. WANG Yi, whose blog has (at least legendarily) been censored frequently, also registered a blawg in FYFZ.cn.
A registrant is not equal to a blawger of cause. Most registrant only post few logs, and a great amount of those logs can not be regarded as "lawgs"—-entertainments and hobbies are always easier than legal analysis. I will introduce some individual blawgs later.
没文化·屁股决定脑袋——有关“学者接受采访收费”的无主题瞎扯
李老师是我最喜欢的学者之一……本来，学者接受采访，应该是特指……将调查到的事实请学者予以评论……现实总是比数学模型要复杂得多……“屁股决定脑袋”是我2005年学到的一个重要词汇……理想情况下的“学者接受采访收费”当然和“有偿新闻”不沾边，当然应该……但权利总是伴随着义务，建议学者在收费前，先观察一下自己的屁股……
我妈的电子邮件
……人活着首先得健康，才有其它。饮食不合口味就自己搞点吃。对世事不要妄加评论，那是20岁人的幼稚。许多有大利益的人都安安静静地活着，轮不到你来指指点点。爹说你书本知识学了许多，但缺点现实。也可说不知天高地厚，这个世界上许多状况很差的人都还心存感激，如果你有心拯救他们，就静下心来学点本事，才是最有效的办法。对待世事的纷繁复杂，要如爹一样沉得住气，这叫心理素质好……
Comments to Legislative Proposals on UEMs of HK
Note to the readers:
1. Only a part of the paper is published here.
2. Please do not copy and/or transmit any paragraph of this paper without the author’s permission.
3. Any one who interested in the topic, please contact me.
Comments and Suggestions to the Consultation Paper on
Legislative Proposals to Contain the Problem of Unsolicited Electronic Messages (Introduction, draft)
I. Introduction
但，他是个律师！
今天看CBS的“六十分钟杂志”，说美国科学家们有关温室效应的研究报告在提交国会前，会受到白宫官员的审查和修改，以使报告中所说明的温室效应现象显得不那么严重。甚至在平常的学术发言中，也要避免用一些词汇，比如“danger”。一位科学家说起自己提交的报告被修改的遭遇时，再三地说：But, he is a lawyer, a politician. He is a lawyer!
呵呵，两点废话:一是censorship看来的确比较危险，美国人的脑子都是直的，所以就更不爽了；二是当lawyer真得随时小心自己的言行，不然不但没权力的时候是滚刀肉，就是有权力的时候也会让人觉得属于有奶便是娘的那种。
《六十分钟杂志》首页：
http://www.cbsnews.com/sections/60minutes/
这一段节目的页面：
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/03/17/60minutes/main1415985.shtml
(图片来源:CBS网站,http://www.cbsnews.com/images/2003/10/30/image580914x.jpg )
没文化·男人和女人的需要(2006)
一党男人聊天，海阔天空神吹胡侃简直到了暗无天日玩物丧志的地步。终于到了应该曲终人散的时候，此时忽然掠过一名女子……大部分人在做大部分事和说大部分话的时候都不知道自己的中心思想是什么……成熟女人对一个男人高潮前及高潮时的“我爱你”一般不太当回事……男人当然不是满脑子只想着翻云覆雨，但如果说男人不想这个东西仅仅是想谈理想谈人生荡气回肠义拨云天那实在也是放屁……男人和女人都有欲望，都要安全——不同的仅仅在于，不少男人性生活的时候很纯情，谈恋爱的时候却很功利；而不少女人谈恋爱的时候很纯情，性生活的时候却很功利……
没文化·未婚证明、安全套、发票和法治社会
《没文化·未婚证明、安全套、发票和法治社会》
作者：法豆
先附上本人2002年初稿、今天修改的一篇小故事作为本文第一部分——今天我一搜，居然在凯迪社区的“笑话人生”被转载。
一
Code and other laws of Cyber Space Ver. 2
Code and Other Laws of Cyberspace, the most wellknown book in the arna of cyberlaw, was published in 1999. After five years in print and five years of changes in law, technology, and the context in which they reside, Code needs an update. But rather than do this alone, Professor Lessig is using this wiki to open the editing process to all, to draw upon the creativity and knowledge of the community. This is an online, collaborative book update; a first of its kind.
干脆做个女权主义者吧
三年前，说到“男性女权主义者”，我曾经十分地谨慎。因为当时我认为无论理论是多么地天花乱坠，但男性与女性在动物世界中的竞争关系是天然存在的。后来我明白了，当时的我仅仅属于读懂了种种女权理论的男性，充其量也就只是一名研究（学习）女权主义的男性。但读懂并不等于笃信，即使是笃信也还属于不可知论的范畴，说得不好听点就是迷信。而要超越迷信，则一定要想通，或曰开悟——这就是释迦牟尼与和尚的区别——不过如果到了笃信这个层次，就已经可以说自己是“某某主义者”了。
但，现在的我，还真觉得自己不但不属于迷信性质的女权主义者，而且在关于女权的问题上，有可能已经参透了“指向月亮的手”和“月亮”之间的关系。为此，我还专门发明了一个词汇：“性别无碍”，用以区别“性别平等”的女权主义口号。
简单地说，“性别平等”是将性别（当然这里指社会性别）作为分配正义的一个重要尺度——你不能因为自己喜欢吃辣椒就觉得有辣椒才是好吃的东西，我也不能因为自己喜欢吃甜食就认为没加糖就不是食品；你喜欢吃辣椒可以，但也必须让我有机会吃到白糖。
而所谓“性别无碍”则不一样，它是指性别根本不被作为一个考虑的因素，跟所谓的公平正义根本没关系，——辣椒和白糖都是调料，任何人都可以吃也可以不吃；我可以今天吃白糖明天吃辣椒，不吃白不吃；你也可以完全不吃这两种东西只吃醋，吃了也白吃。