2005 PRC Anti spamming Legislation | 互联网电子邮件服务管理办法
China enacted his own anti-spamming legal system in a new regulation named Electronic Mail Administrative orders (EMAO hereinafter). Announced by the Department of Information Industry, which is a branch of China’s central government, this Subordinate legislation has a national effectiveness.
From article 11 to article 17, EMAO established a strict but recapitulative regulation dealing with the severe problem of spamming, which has a few characters as follows:
Firstly, EMAO adopts a strict “opt-in” regime to prohibit the rampant spamming activities in China. Overseas experience has been inconclusive as to whether an opt-in regime or an opt-out regime is better in curbing spam. The opt-in regime requires the sender of commercial electronic messages to have pre-existing business relationship with the recipient, or have obtained consent from the recipient before he could send commercial electronic messages to that recipient. While an opt-out regime requires the sender of commercial electronic messages to stop sending further commercial electronic messages to a recipient if the recipient so requests, but before receiving such a request, the sender may continue to send such messages to the recipient. In article 13, the order prohibit “any organization and individual” sending or relegating to others sending e-mail in which includes commercial advertisement content “without an unambiguous consent” from the recipients.
Secondly, EMAO prohibited some technical applications that often used by spammers, while the regulation does not covered all possible illegitimate techniques. “Address-harvesting” are “dictionary attacks” are prohibited by article 12. Nevertheless, the conduct of using scripts of other automated means to register for multiple e-mail address, and then sending e-mails via these address (named as “automatic throwaway accounts”) dose not be mentioned in EMAO.
登记了DoNews的Inout,就不断收到刘韧私人名义发出的信件,以下是最近的一封。我也不知道怎么提高点击量,干脆就把信贴出来试试吧。
《互联网电子邮件服务管理办法》实行已经有些日子了。有件事我一直想说,今天回朋友的邮件,又看到广告。所以就提一下。
根据
操作软件正版率低,是因为主流操作软件(如Microsoft Windows)价格高,市场不接受从而导致盗版,同时盗版的主流操作软件侵蚀了本来属于非主流操作软件(如Linux)的市场空间,导致正版非主流操作软件也没法卖。这是小孩子都应当懂的道理。有的人扯呀扯,扯出很多奇怪的理由,我看不懂——右边这张图是我从网上搜来的,不是帮他做广告,是想给各位看官看看垄断的力量。垄断导致价格不公,价格不公导致盗版泛滥,如此显然的问题放在那里不去解决,出台些这样的《通知》,有什么用?
”标志。
