什么是隐私权？——由“公布”公务员考试成绩而引发的议论
我国立法对隐私权的保护一直欠缺……反倒是层级并不高的行政法规、规章……下列政府信息，免予公开……本文的目的，是通过分析上述规定的合理性，进而讨论“隐私权是什么？”以及“隐私权该怎么规定？”等等“法律学”的问题……“隐私”是什么，和“个人信息”或者“个人资料”有什么区别？
Category: 专业日志
略论商业网站“马后炮式”转载声明的非法性
一些网站为了让自己的转载显得有道理，往往弄一个转载声明……很显然这种行为不具有合法性。著作权法及司法解释中的“法定许可”，除了尊重著作人身权外，还要满足三个条件……明明这是一个可以办到的事，在很多论述中，却被堂而皇之被冠以“海量许可”一类的大词……赚钱没错，但赚钱必须要付出成本……一个力图引领改革的政府，在这个时候才需要显示其作用……
对“《艾滋病防治条例》“闯红灯”再论”的回复
关于我写的“《爱滋病防治条例》“闯红灯”了吗——法律分析后的答卷”一文，“正义天使”有了“再论”：http://xxliu215.fyfz.cn/blog/xxliu215/index.aspx?blogid=51524，并且到我在fyfz.cn上的博客上邀请我辩论。故对他的再论，简单作出了如下的回复。
“门户”们就是如此“净化”网络空气的
办法一：你不是色吗？没关系，要的就是你色……
这是某国内著名“门户”2006年4月6日的首页部分截图——注意，这可都不是“两性健康”栏目。再说，“健康”也不等于性健康……
刚才看见CC中国的邮件列表上一段话，一个不忍心就说了一堆话。
对Cola，似乎是人民大学的项目成员的回复……
I don’t agree with Cola’s argue at this topic.
This is not the problem of being "hegemonic" or not. I am sure no one here will decrease the endeavor of improving the development of CCChina because of "interest".
This is not the problem of whether will we "disseminate" the CC China mainland. Of course we will. I have done it for about two years and have never sought for any "interests". I believe most of persons here are same even the name is something like ZHI SHI GONG XIANG. I believe the founder of this group don’t wish here turns to an ads. program that broadcasting good news only, like C*TV. I suppose all members here are at least understand what is CC, so we come here just for discussing, commenting and contributing – if you need any help.
Creative Commons 中国大陆2.5版出来了
这个东西现在被翻译成：
“知识共享协议简体中文版2.5”
…My God…怎么能这么翻译呢……这很明显是不合适的。“创作共用协议”中国大陆版2.5，连最不应该有疑问的题目都有了问题，那条款内容看来也值得先检查一下了……
找了半天，看见Google 上他们获得的Group。争论的人很多，但是似乎都属于不能决定事的……似乎Issac Mao不在这个组里了？
怎么用这样一个不贴切的名字呢？弄得我都不敢叫它创作共用了
另外莱斯格也来了，倒不是追星，只是想听听有什么地方可以选题……唉……
让中国法律博客与世界真正连通：关于建立China BLawg Review的提议
Update:这个提议似乎因为过于烦琐和理想主义而没有获得足够的响应。目前只好作为存档。
提议人：董皓（Donnie H. Dong）、张樊（Zhang Fan）
最热门的法律博客（BLawg）是什么？是Blawg
Review（部分地区可能看不到，点这里看其中的一期），与其说这是一个博客，不如说是一个众人拾柴的大厦。fyfz.cn的《法律博客周刊》是一个类似的一
blawg或者China
Blawg得到的有效信息非常少。于是我们想到：如果我们能建立一个英文的China
BLawg
Review，使中国法律博客和世界接轨，那一定会在传播中国的“地方性知识”的同时，对所有中国和国外的法律人交流法律信息提供巨大帮助——这一定是一个好主
CBR: An Introduction of Chinese Blawgs
CBR is an abbreviation of China Blawg Review, initiated by Donnie, is (or will be) an online blogging journal aims at introducing Chinese Blawgs to those do not speak Chinese. Welcome to participate this free and creative-common work. Please contact me if you are interested in participating the team.
The first lawg of CBR is: An Introduction of Chinese BLawgs, Ver. 0.6, by Donnie H. Dong. Please follow the link and have a happy reading.
An Introduction of Chinese Blawgs, Beta
Blawgging For China Blawg Review Vol. 1 Ver Beta 0.1
Title: An Introduction of Chinese Blawgs
Ver.: Beta 0.1
Date: 20060330
Ver.: Beta 0.1
Date: 20060330
By: Donnie H. DONG (http://blawgdog.com)
Licence: CC:by-nc-sa
Licence: CC:by-nc-sa
Because of the difficulty of reading Chinese characters (even knowing Chinese, one may be crazy when he find that Chinese itself includes three kinds of totally different computer character formats, that’s why Taiwan might split from China in cyber era, I think), a small part of China Blawg map has been unveiled to English surfers. Actually, most of disclosed China blawgs are with some "foreign link", that is, the blawgers may be foreign researchers and/or lawyers interested in China’s law, or its market, and these blawgs are mostly in pure English.
However, Chinese lawyers have established a large (not very heavy yet) Chinese blawg atlas in Chinese character, though the first legal Chinese blawg service provider appeared just around Jan 2005. Now there are thousands of blawgs in China, and the blawgers covered nearly all legal professions.
Most Chinese blawgs are set on blawg service providers’ servers, and rare ones have their own independent domain name. Now there are 7 blawg service providers. They are FYFZ.cn (more than 8000 registrants), Cnlawblog.com (more than 8000), Lawoy.com (400), Blog.highcourt.org (less than 3000 but only 100 active), Lawblog.cn (700), chinaeclaw.com (less than 400)and Lawspirit.org (more than 1000). The last one declares that it provides a “bilingual” blawg system, but it seems this ad does not allure potential blawgers. Interestingly, the FYFZ.cn, which provides the poorest application, is the most popular one, i.e. there are more than 500 active individual blawgs set on this site and the dozens of new ones are created each day.
The most significant characteristic of FYFZ.cn is that it is more "academic" or even "bookishness" than the others. Although the amount of lawyers’ (I mean barristers and solicitors here) blawgs is the highest, scholars dominate the site undoubtedly. A few eminent professors and more legal researchers lawg there activates, ideas, book chapters and even research proposals on there own blawgs. Among them, Dr. XU Xin becomes the top one with his blawg "Poetical Justice", which get more than 347 thousands hits since Jan 2005. Other famous scholars include Prof. XIE Hui, Prof. LIN Lai-Fan, Prof. HE Wei-fang, Prof. WEI Dun-You, Prof. ZHANG Chu, Prof. ZHANG Jian-Sheng, Prof. ZHANG Hai-Bing, Prof. FAN Jin-Xue, Prof. GU Ming-Kang, etc. WANG Yi, whose blog has (at least legendarily) been censored frequently, also registered a blawg in FYFZ.cn.
A registrant is not equal to a blawger of cause. Most registrant only post few logs, and a great amount of those logs can not be regarded as "lawgs"—-entertainments and hobbies are always easier than legal analysis. I will introduce some individual blawgs later.
没文化·屁股决定脑袋——有关“学者接受采访收费”的无主题瞎扯
李老师是我最喜欢的学者之一……本来，学者接受采访，应该是特指……将调查到的事实请学者予以评论……现实总是比数学模型要复杂得多……“屁股决定脑袋”是我2005年学到的一个重要词汇……理想情况下的“学者接受采访收费”当然和“有偿新闻”不沾边，当然应该……但权利总是伴随着义务，建议学者在收费前，先观察一下自己的屁股……