BlawgDog | 博铎法豆

The Statute of Anne 1710

The Statute of Anne; April 10, 1710

 

8 Anne, c. 19 (1710)

An act for the encouragement of learning, by vesting the copies of printed books in the authors or purchasers of such copies, during the times therein mentioned.

I. Whereas printers, booksellers, and other persons have of late frequently taken the liberty of printing, reprinting, and publishing, or causing to be printed, reprinted, and published, books and other writings, without the consent of the authors or proprietors of such books and writings, to their very great detriment, and too often to the ruin of them and their families: for preventing therefore such practices for the future, and for the encouragement of learned men to compose and write useful books; may it please your Majesty, that it may be enacted, and be it enacted by the Queen’s most excellent majesty, by and with the advice and consent of the lords spiritual and temporal, and commons, in this present parliament assembled, and by the authority of the same;

II. That from and after the tenth day of April, one thousand seven hundred and ten, the author of any book or books already printed, who hath not transferred to any other the copy or copies of such book or books, share or shares thereof, or the bookseller or booksellers, printer or printers, or other person or persons, who hath or have purchased or acquired the copy or copies of any book or books, in order to print or reprint the same, shall have the sole right and liberty of printing such book and books for the term of one and twenty years, to commence from the said tenth day of April, and no longer; and That the author of any book or books already composed, and not printed and published, or that shall hereafter be composed, and his assignee or assigns, shall have the sole liberty of printing and reprinting such book and books for the term of fourteen years, to commence from the day of the first publishing the same, and no longer; and That if any other bookseller, printer or other person whatsoever, from and after the tenth day of April, one thousand seven hundred and ten, within the times granted and limited by this act, as aforesaid, shall print, reprint, or import, or cause to be printed, reprinted, or imported, any such book or books, without the consent of the proprietor or proprietors thereof first had and obtained in writing, signed in the presence of two or more credible witnesses; or knowing the same to be so printed or reprinted, without the consent of the proprietors, shall sell, publish, or expose to sale, or cause to be sold, published, or exposed to sale, any such book or books, without such consent first had and obtained, as aforesaid: then such offender or offenders shall forfeit such book or books, and all and every sheet or sheets, being part of such book or books, to the proprietor or proprietors of the copy thereof, who shall forthwith damask, and make waste paper of them; and further, That every such offender or offenders shall forfeit one penny for every sheet which shall be found in his, her, or their custody, either printed or printing, published, or exposed to sale, contrary to the true intent and meaning of this act; the one moiety thereof to the Queen’s most excellent majesty, her heirs and successors, and the other moiety thereof to any person or persons that shall sue for the same, to be recovered in any of her Majesty’s courts of record at Westminister, by action of debt, bill, plaint, or information, in which no wager of law, essoin, privilege, or protection, or more than one imparlance shall be allowed. II. And whereas many persons may through ignorance offend against this act, unless some provision be made, whereby the property in every such book, as is intended by this act to be secured to the proprietor or proprietors thereof, may be ascertained, as likewise the consent of such proprietor or proprietors for the printing or reprinting of such book or books may from time to time be known; be it therefore further enacted by the authority aforesaid,

That nothing in this act contained shall be construed to extend to subject any bookseller, printer, or other person whatsoever, to the forfeitures or penalties therein mentioned, for or by reason of the printing or reprinting of any book or books without such consent, as aforesaid, unless the title to the copy of such book or books hereafter published shall, before such publication, be entered in the register book of the company of stationers, in such manner as hath been usual, which register book shall at all times be kept at the hall of the said company, and unless such consent of the proprietor or proprietors be in like manner entered as aforesaid, for every of which several entries, six pence shall be paid, and no more; which said register book may, at all seasonable and convenient time, be resorted to, and inspected by any bookseller, printer, or other person, for the purposes before-mentioned, without any fee or reward; and the clerk of the said company of stationers shall, when and as often as thereunto required, give a certificate under his hand of such entry or entries, and for every such certificate may take a fee not exceeding six pence.

United States Copyright Act of 1909

 From: http://law.copyrightdata.com/, this text was valid from July 1, 1909 to August 23, 1912.

March 4,1909.

AN ACT TO AMEND AND CONSOLIDATE THE ACTS RESPECTING COPYRIGHT.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled, That any person entitled thereto, upon complying with the provisions of this Act, shall have the exclusive right:

US Copyright Act of 1790

The Copyright Act of 1790 was the first federal copyright act to be instituted in the United States, though most of the states had passed various legislation securing copyrights in the years immediately following the Revolutionary War. The stated object of the act was the "encouragement of learning," and it achieved this by securing authors the "sole right and liberty of printing, reprinting, publishing and vending" the copies of their "maps, charts, and books" for a term of 14 years, with the right to renew for one additional 14 year term should the copyright holder still be alive.

刘家瑞:论版权间接责任与直接侵权的关系

论版权间接责任与直接侵权的关系

刘家瑞

摘要:在版权司法及理论界,帮助侵权和转承责任等间接责任形式作为网络服务商归责原则的重要性日益显现,但对其中某些基本问题的认识并不一致。通过对间接责任和直接侵权之间的关系进行探讨,可以明确间接责任人和直接侵权人的连带责任、诉讼当事人的选择、直接侵权抗辩对间接责任人的效力、当事人之间的追偿关系,以及部分和解协议对其他当事人的影响等问题,并为我国的版权司法实践提供一些理论参考。

关键词:间接责任、帮助侵权、转承责任

本文引用方式:

刘家瑞,“论版权间接责任与直接侵权的关系”,《电子知识产权》2010年第1期,页39-49。

点此下载全文(PDF,850K)

 

关于“互联网是”什么的搜索实验

Doc Searls 在他的博客上记录了自己在Google上和Twitter上对 "The Internet is” 的搜索结果(带引号,即只显示包含这个完整的短语的页面),下面是他整理的Google上的结果(Twitter的请到他博客上去看):

“The Internet is” 互联网是:

1. a Series of Tubes 一系列管道

2. terrible 可怕的

3. really big 实在非常大

4. for porn 色..情.信息

5. shit 一坨屎

6. good 好东西

7. wrong 一个错误

8. killing storytelling 扼杀谎话

更多请入内阅读

 

中华人民共和国著作权法(2010修订)

中华人民共和国主席令(第二十六号)

《全国人民代表大会常务委员会关于修改<中华人民共和国著作权法>的决定》已由中华人民共和国第十一届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第十三次会议于2010年2月26日通过,现予公布,自2010年4月1日起施行

 胡 

中华人民共和国主席  锦 

涛 

2010年2月26日

中华人民共和国著作权法(1990年9月7日第七届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第十五次会议通过 根据2001年10月27日第九届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第二十四次会议《关于修改〈中华人民共和国著作权法〉的决定》第一次修正 根据2010年2月26日第十一届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第十三次会议《关于修改〈中华人民共和国著作权法〉的决定》第二次修正)

 

2010年两会中有关互联网治理的言论集锦三

豆按:以下内容仅为积累学术资料目的而搜集,不代表我赞同或反对其中的观点。

集锦一 | 集锦二

目录:

人大代表提议网络要搞后台实名制

“网络自由的边界是法律”——代表委员热议探索中的中国网络监管

人大代表呼吁要真实不要虚拟 在网络等领域实现实名制

人大代表建议正确引导网络监督

李毅中:(个人网站)停掉以后进行清理,然后再一个一个的恢复

2001年著作权法中表演权概念的毛病

先看《伯尔尼公约》第十一条

 

Article 11 (Certain Rights in Dramatic and Musical Works: 1. Right of public performance and of communication to the public of a performance; 2. In respect of translations
(1) Authors of dramatic, dramatico-musical and musical works shall enjoy the exclusive right of authorizing: 
    (i) the public performance of their works, including such public performance by any means or process; 
   (ii) any communication to the public of the performance of their works.
第十一条1. 戏剧作品、音乐戏剧作品和音乐作品的作者享有下列专有权利,以授权:
(1) 公开表演其作品,包括用各种手段和方式公开表演
(2) 用各种手段公开播送其作品的表演

 

在伯尔尼公约,“公开表演”意思是:在公开场合(或者至少是在一个向公众开放的场合)对作品的表演。[Guide to the copyright and related rights treaties administered by WIPO]

 

2010年两会中有关互联网治理的言论集锦一

豆按:以下内容仅为积累学术资料目的而搜集,不代表赞同或反对其中的观点。

集锦二 | 集锦三

  • 李肇星:中国网民依法享受网络交往自由
  • 代表建议:网络语言分级 网游分时开放
  • 全国人大代表徐龙建议尽快制定电子商务法
  • 大代表建议:网络“扫黄”须立法
  • 人大代表沈长富:网络文化病态化庸俗化加剧
  • 人大代表建言“网络问政”:建立全国联动统一平台
  • 人大代表:网络监督应遵守适度原则
  • 夏绩恩等代表建议鼓励网络创业创造更多就业机会
  • 部分人大代表认为局长日记不算隐私 应受到监督

 

分享一点粗浅的法学论文写作经验

  今天和同学在QQ上聊起写论文,胡乱说了几句方法的东西,事后一读觉得还挺有意思,贴在这里分享一下,自己也记录一下。

  法学研究毕竟与社会学不同。首先还是对法律逻辑体系的整理、批评和回顾。我觉得首要的研究是现有立法。先把现有立法、现有司法判决整理出来,我觉得这是第一步。第一步看了一些立法和判决后,会发现立法和司法中的问题,比如模糊之处,或者矛盾之处。再针对问题去找相关的资料,这样就很快缩小范围了。

  至于外国的相关制度,则不能着急。要等真的整理出了问题之后,再去找外国的法律。否则,以方向(或“主题”)为关键词去找外国的东西,就很容易失败。很多研究者都想拿自己的题目直接翻译后去搜索外国资料,然后会发现外国没有相对应的立法。我想主要的问题是没有注意到比较法的局限。比较法作为一种方法,还是以功能主义为主。功能等同的制度,在描述上,在学科归属上,各国会非常不同。所以不见得有用。

  只有发现问题后,才有可能带着问题去找资料,包括阅读外国的立法(或教科书,教科书往往很有用),通篇阅读(或者至少看目录),而不是单独找对应条款(因为常常找不到对应的),然后才能发现其中可能可以解决相关问题的条款。

中国著作权法于2010年2月26日修正

新华社27日消息

全国人民代表大会常务委员会关于修改《中华人民共和国著作权法》的决定
(2010年2月26日第十一届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第十三次会议通过)

第十一届全国人民代表大会常务委员会第十三次会议决定对《中华人民共和国著作权法》作如下修改:

一、将第四条修改为:“著作权人行使著作权,不得违反宪法和法律,不得损害公共利益。国家对作品的出版、传播依法进行监督管理。”

二、增加一条,作为第二十六条:“以著作权出质的,由出质人和质权人向国务院著作权行政管理部门办理出质登记。”

本决定自2010年4月1日起施行。

《中华人民共和国著作权法》根据本决定作修改并对条款顺序作调整后,重新公布。

 

  这个修正案修正了什么呢?时间有限,这里暂不详细分析。只简单记录下。先看修正前的第四条:

 

  第四条 依法禁止出版、传播的作品,不受本法保护。

 

  这一条款在2007年开始、2009年裁决的美国诉中国WTO知识产权纠纷案DS362中被WTO纠纷解决机构判定为违反中国作为WTO成员国的义务(相关详细介绍的帖子点此)。因此,中国需要修改这个条款。现在中国修改了,算是执行了WTO的裁决。

  至于新增加的第二十六条,则实际上已经规定在担保法里。而且早在1996年,国家版权局就已经做出了具体的规定(点此看《著作权质押合同登记办法》)。换句话说,实际上这不是新的规定。

 

  最后,说个有关立法技术的问题——为什么中国法律修改新增条款就不会换一种方法呢?这样横插一条就直接改变此后的所有条款的条文号,时间一长,未来许多人再看修正前的司法判决,就会找不到判决中所指的条款。为什么不能简单写成“第二十五条之二”呢?